Sajid Islam and David Alcenius defended a lawsuit brought by a plaintiff medical provider that sought to recover the balance of its bills under the Michigan No-Fault Act. Sajid and David argued that the provider’s claims were predicated on the underlying claimant being eligible for benefits under the Michigan Assigned Claims Plan. Sajid and David argued that the underlying claimant failed to comply with statutory provisions of the No-Fault Act requiring cooperation, and that the claimant was not entitled to any damages as a result. Ultimately, the Court agreed with Sajid and David’s arguments, and dismissed the plaintiff’s claims.