Stephanie Tzafaroglou successfully obtained summary disposition of all claims brought against a client of the firm in a catastrophic claim in which damages exceed $1 million. The plaintiff in this case sustained significant injuries in an automobile accident. Plaintiff, along with four Intervening Plaintiffs, brought a claim for No-Fault benefits against the firm’s client, a No-Fault insurer. The plaintiffs also sued two additional insurers for No-Fault benefits arising out of the same accident. The firm’s client issued an automobile policy of insurance to the plaintiff’s father. Ms. Tzafaroglou argued that the firm’s client was not the insurer responsible for payment of plaintiff’s No-Fault benefits as Plaintiff was not domiciled with her father at the time of the accident. As a result, the firm’s client was not in the order of priority pursuant to MCL 500.3114(1). Despite significant opposition from all four plaintiffs and the two other insurance defendants, the court agreed with Ms. Tzafaroglou’s arguments and granted summary disposition in favor of the firm’s client. As a result, all claims from all four plaintiffs were dismissed with prejudice.